Libya vs Ukraine: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Libya
- Ukraine
How they compare
Libya currently reports 46,968 1000 USD against 45,187 1000 USD in Ukraine, a difference of 1,781 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 33rd and Ukraine ranks 34th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,726 1000 USD | 504.91 1000 USD | 12,221 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2010s | 18,346 1000 USD | 1,413 1000 USD | 16,933 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2020s | 25,651 1000 USD | 46,500 1000 USD | 20,849 1000 USD | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Libya or Ukraine?
- Libya, at 46,968 1000 USD against 45,187 1000 USD in Ukraine as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Libya and Ukraine?
- 1,781 1000 USD, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Ukraine?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Ukraine rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Libya ranks 33rd and Ukraine ranks 34th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf