Mali vs North Macedonia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Mali
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 434.23 1000 USD against 433.94 1000 USD in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.29 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 107th of 169 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,254 1000 USD | 120.34 1000 USD | 1,133 1000 USD | Mali |
| 2010s | 6,793 1000 USD | 124.34 1000 USD | 6,669 1000 USD | Mali |
| 2020s | 1,566 1000 USD | 257.73 1000 USD | 1,309 1000 USD | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Mali or North Macedonia?
- Mali, at 434.23 1000 USD against 433.94 1000 USD in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Mali and North Macedonia?
- 0.29 1000 USD, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and North Macedonia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Mali and North Macedonia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Mali ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 107th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf