Panama vs Senegal: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Panama
- Senegal
How they compare
Panama currently reports 8,126 1000 USD against 7,418 1000 USD in Senegal, a difference of 708 1000 USD.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Senegal ahead.
Panama ranks 72nd and Senegal ranks 73rd of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 254.34 1000 USD | 1,230 1000 USD | 976.06 1000 USD | Senegal |
| 2010s | 3,568 1000 USD | 1,254 1000 USD | 2,313 1000 USD | Panama |
| 2020s | 8,410 1000 USD | 5,815 1000 USD | 2,595 1000 USD | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Panama or Senegal?
- Panama, at 8,126 1000 USD against 7,418 1000 USD in Senegal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Panama and Senegal?
- 708 1000 USD, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Senegal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Senegal rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Panama ranks 72nd and Senegal ranks 73rd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf