Qatar vs Saint Lucia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Qatar
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 45.06 1000 USD against 39.5 1000 USD in Qatar, a difference of 5.56 1000 USD.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Qatar ahead.
Qatar ranks 133rd and Saint Lucia ranks 130th of 169 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.01 1000 USD | 15.96 1000 USD | 0.05 1000 USD | Qatar |
| 2020s | 180.3 1000 USD | 45.06 1000 USD | 135.24 1000 USD | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Qatar or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 45.06 1000 USD against 39.5 1000 USD in Qatar as of 2020.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Qatar and Saint Lucia?
- 5.56 1000 USD, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do Qatar and Saint Lucia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Qatar ranks 133rd and Saint Lucia ranks 130th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf