Türkiye vs Viet Nam: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value over time
- Türkiye
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 252,120 1000 USD against 246,261 1000 USD in Türkiye, a difference of 5,859 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Türkiye ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 169 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Türkiye | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130,446 1000 USD | 232,266 1000 USD | 101,820 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 215,308 1000 USD | 361,206 1000 USD | 145,898 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 214,378 1000 USD | 238,867 1000 USD | 24,490 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value, Türkiye or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 252,120 1000 USD against 246,261 1000 USD in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value between Türkiye and Viet Nam?
- 5,859 1000 USD, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Türkiye and Viet Nam rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — import value?
- Türkiye ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf