Bangladesh vs Lithuania: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Production
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Production over time
- Bangladesh
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 151,843 t against 49,000 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 102,843 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 3.1 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Lithuania ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 12th and Lithuania ranks 10th of 56 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54,500 t | 849,246 t | 794,746 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 55,000 t | 781,091 t | 726,091 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 82,250 t | 199,643 t | 117,393 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — production, Bangladesh or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 151,843 t against 49,000 t in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — production between Bangladesh and Lithuania?
- 102,843 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Lithuania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Lithuania rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — production?
- Bangladesh ranks 12th and Lithuania ranks 10th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf