Aruba vs Tonga: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods
Aruba
0 hectares
in 2025
Tonga
0 hectares
in 2025
Aruba rank
85th
Tonga rank
85th
Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods over time
- Aruba
- Tonga
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tonga, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 85th and Tonga ranks 85th of 235 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, Aruba or Tonga?
- Aruba, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tonga as of 2025.
- What is the difference in change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods between Aruba and Tonga?
- 0 hectares, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Tonga?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Tonga rank globally for change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods?
- Aruba ranks 85th and Tonga ranks 85th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.