Australia vs Uzbekistan: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported

Australia
54,094 hectares
in 2025
Uzbekistan
41,038 hectares
in 2025
Australia rank
10th
Uzbekistan rank
12th

Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported over time

  • Australia
  • Uzbekistan
-200.0k-100.0k0100.0k200.0k300.0k199120082025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 54,094 hectares against 41,038 hectares in Uzbekistan, a difference of 13,056 hectares.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Australia ranks 10th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 235 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s -166,736 hectares 41,209 hectares 207,945 hectares Uzbekistan
2000s -172,928 hectares 39,054 hectares 211,982 hectares Uzbekistan
2010s 178,965 hectares 35,029 hectares 143,935 hectares Australia
2020s 71,198 hectares 38,852 hectares 32,347 hectares Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, Australia or Uzbekistan?
Australia, at 54,094 hectares against 41,038 hectares in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods between Australia and Uzbekistan?
13,056 hectares, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uzbekistan?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Australia and Uzbekistan rank globally for change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods?
Australia ranks 10th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Uzbekistan: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/australia/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/australia/uzbekistan/">Australia vs Uzbekistan: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,225 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.