Botswana vs New Caledonia: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods

Botswana
0 hectares
in 2025
New Caledonia
0 hectares
in 2025
Botswana rank
85th
New Caledonia rank
85th

Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods over time

  • Botswana
  • New Caledonia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k199120082025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Botswana ranks 85th and New Caledonia ranks 85th of 235 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 hectares 672 hectares 672 hectares New Caledonia
2000s 0 hectares 172.5 hectares 172.5 hectares New Caledonia
2010s 183.98 hectares 5,371 hectares 5,187 hectares New Caledonia
2020s 76.66 hectares 0 hectares 76.66 hectares Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, Botswana or New Caledonia?
Botswana, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in New Caledonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods between Botswana and New Caledonia?
0 hectares, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and New Caledonia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Botswana and New Caledonia rank globally for change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods?
Botswana ranks 85th and New Caledonia ranks 85th of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs New Caledonia: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/botswana/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/botswana/new-caledonia/">Botswana vs New Caledonia: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,225 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.