Eswatini vs Western Sahara: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported

Eswatini
-1,500 hectares
in 2025
Western Sahara
-798.01 hectares
in 2025
Eswatini rank
169th
Western Sahara rank
166th

Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported over time

  • Eswatini
  • Western Sahara
-6.0k-4.0k-2.0k0199120082025

How they compare

Western Sahara currently reports -798.01 hectares against -1,500 hectares in Eswatini, a difference of 701.99 hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 169th and Western Sahara ranks 166th of 235 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Western Sahara in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1990s -1,500 hectares -6,591 hectares 5,091 hectares Eswatini
2000s -1,500 hectares -867 hectares 633 hectares Western Sahara
2010s -1,500 hectares -299.3 hectares 1,201 hectares Western Sahara
2020s -1,500 hectares -874.68 hectares 625.32 hectares Western Sahara

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, Eswatini or Western Sahara?
Western Sahara, at -798.01 hectares against -1,500 hectares in Eswatini as of 2025.
What is the difference in change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods between Eswatini and Western Sahara?
701.99 hectares, with Western Sahara ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Western Sahara?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Western Sahara rank globally for change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods?
Eswatini ranks 169th and Western Sahara ranks 166th of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Western Sahara: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/eswatini/western-sahara/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/eswatini/western-sahara/">Eswatini vs Western Sahara: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,225 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.