Ethiopia vs Papua New Guinea: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported

Ethiopia
-3,920 hectares
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
-3,750 hectares
in 2025
Ethiopia rank
178th
Papua New Guinea rank
176th

Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Papua New Guinea
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0199120082025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports -3,750 hectares against -3,920 hectares in Ethiopia, a difference of 170 hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 178th and Papua New Guinea ranks 176th of 235 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s -72,810 hectares -21,914 hectares 50,896 hectares Papua New Guinea
2000s -72,801 hectares -21,918 hectares 50,883 hectares Papua New Guinea
2010s -38,360 hectares -12,919 hectares 25,441 hectares Papua New Guinea
2020s -3,917 hectares -6,635 hectares 2,718 hectares Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, Ethiopia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at -3,750 hectares against -3,920 hectares in Ethiopia as of 2025.
What is the difference in change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods between Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea?
170 hectares, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods?
Ethiopia ranks 178th and Papua New Guinea ranks 176th of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Papua New Guinea: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/ethiopia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/ethiopia/papua-new-guinea/">Ethiopia vs Papua New Guinea: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,225 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.