French Polynesia vs Palestine: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported

French Polynesia
0 hectares
in 2025
Palestine
0 hectares
in 2025
French Polynesia rank
85th
Palestine rank
85th

Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Palestine
0100200300400199120082025

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Palestine, a difference of 0 hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 85th and Palestine ranks 85th of 235 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 412 hectares 0 hectares 412 hectares French Polynesia
2000s 123.1 hectares 81 hectares 42.1 hectares French Polynesia
2010s 9.1 hectares 110.4 hectares 101.3 hectares Palestine
2020s 0 hectares 17.67 hectares 17.67 hectares Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, French Polynesia or Palestine?
French Polynesia, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Palestine as of 2025.
What is the difference in change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods between French Polynesia and Palestine?
0 hectares, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Palestine?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do French Polynesia and Palestine rank globally for change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods?
French Polynesia ranks 85th and Palestine ranks 85th of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Palestine: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/french-polynesia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-forest-change-vs-imported-deforestation/french-polynesia/west-bank-and-gaza/">French Polynesia vs Palestine: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,225 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.