Monaco vs Pitcairn: Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods
Monaco
0 hectares
in 2025
Pitcairn
0 hectares
in 2025
Monaco rank
85th
Pitcairn rank
85th
Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods over time
- Monaco
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Pitcairn, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Pitcairn has been ahead every year.
Monaco ranks 85th and Pitcairn ranks 85th of 235 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods, Monaco or Pitcairn?
- Monaco, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Pitcairn as of 2025.
- What is the difference in change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods between Monaco and Pitcairn?
- 0 hectares, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Pitcairn?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Monaco and Pitcairn rank globally for change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods?
- Monaco ranks 85th and Pitcairn ranks 85th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in domestic forest area vs. deforestation embedded in imported goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.