Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Amount excreted in manure

Russian Federation
17.86 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
1.11 million kg
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Ducks — Amount excreted in manure over time

  • Russian Federation
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 17.86 million kg against 1.11 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 16.75 million kg.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 16.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 94 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 1.73 million kg 981,558 kg 744,349 kg Russian Federation
2000s 10.74 million kg 1.07 million kg 9.67 million kg Russian Federation
2010s 20.18 million kg 1.10 million kg 19.08 million kg Russian Federation
2020s 17.41 million kg 1.11 million kg 16.30 million kg Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — amount excreted in manure, Russian Federation or United Republic of Tanzania?
Russian Federation, at 17.86 million kg against 1.11 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — amount excreted in manure between Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
16.75 million kg, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ducks — amount excreted in manure?
Russian Federation ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Amount excreted in manure (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Amount excreted in manure. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/russian-federation-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/russian-federation-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Amount excreted in manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Amount excreted in manure (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).