Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Ducks — Losses from manure treated
Ducks — Losses from manure treated over time
- Uruguay
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0 kg against 0 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kg.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Uruguay ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 102 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg | 0 kg | 0 kg | — |
| 1970s | 0 kg | 0 kg | 0 kg | — |
| 1980s | 0 kg | 0 kg | 0 kg | — |
| 1990s | 0 kg | 0 kg | 0 kg | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ducks — losses from manure treated, Uruguay or Zimbabwe?
- Uruguay, at 0 kg against 0 kg in Zimbabwe as of 1990.
- What is the difference in ducks — losses from manure treated between Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
- 0 kg, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
- How do Uruguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for ducks — losses from manure treated?
- Uruguay ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).