French Polynesia vs Papua New Guinea: Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils

French Polynesia
23,803 kg
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
15,075 kg
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
76th
Papua New Guinea rank
78th

Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Papua New Guinea
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 23,803 kg against 15,075 kg in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 8,728 kg.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.6 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 76th and Papua New Guinea ranks 78th of 102 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 11,372 kg 4,672 kg 6,700 kg French Polynesia
1970s 19,756 kg 3,412 kg 16,345 kg French Polynesia
1980s 19,518 kg 4,285 kg 15,234 kg French Polynesia
1990s 24,358 kg 6,665 kg 17,693 kg French Polynesia
2000s 25,628 kg 11,584 kg 14,044 kg French Polynesia
2010s 24,120 kg 13,647 kg 10,473 kg French Polynesia
2020s 24,001 kg 14,678 kg 9,323 kg French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks β€” manure applied to soils, French Polynesia or Papua New Guinea?
French Polynesia, at 23,803 kg against 15,075 kg in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks β€” manure applied to soils between French Polynesia and Papua New Guinea?
8,728 kg, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for ducks β€” manure applied to soils?
French Polynesia ranks 76th and Papua New Guinea ranks 78th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Papua New Guinea: Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/french-polynesia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/french-polynesia/papua-new-guinea/">French Polynesia vs Papua New Guinea: Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).