Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Ducks — Manure applied to soils

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
5.67 million kg
in 2023
Myanmar
5.10 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
15th
Myanmar rank
13th

Ducks — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Myanmar
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 5.67 million kg against 5.10 million kg in Myanmar, a difference of 570,990 kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th and Myanmar ranks 13th of 31 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 656,551 kg 1.04 million kg 384,687 kg Myanmar
1970s 820,112 kg 1.48 million kg 657,241 kg Myanmar
1980s 1.86 million kg 2.37 million kg 509,809 kg Myanmar
1990s 1.96 million kg 2.13 million kg 175,051 kg Myanmar
2000s 3.62 million kg 4.11 million kg 489,208 kg Myanmar
2010s 4.63 million kg 7.76 million kg 3.13 million kg Myanmar
2020s 5.35 million kg 4.63 million kg 726,978 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure applied to soils, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Myanmar?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 5.67 million kg against 5.10 million kg in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure applied to soils between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
570,990 kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar rank globally for ducks — manure applied to soils?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th and Myanmar ranks 13th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Ducks — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Ducks — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).