Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils

Papua New Guinea
15,075 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
13,676 kg
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
72nd

Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 15,075 kg against 13,676 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,399 kg.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 93 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 4,672 kg 777.07 kg 3,895 kg Papua New Guinea
1970s 3,412 kg 1,026 kg 2,386 kg Papua New Guinea
1980s 4,285 kg 3,341 kg 943.12 kg Papua New Guinea
1990s 6,665 kg 7,506 kg 841.69 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 11,584 kg 11,330 kg 254.4 kg Papua New Guinea
2010s 13,647 kg 12,946 kg 701 kg Papua New Guinea
2020s 14,678 kg 13,599 kg 1,080 kg Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks β€” manure applied to soils, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 15,075 kg against 13,676 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks β€” manure applied to soils between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
1,399 kg, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for ducks β€” manure applied to soils?
Papua New Guinea ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).