Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils

Rwanda
3,885 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
5,439 kg
in 2023
Rwanda rank
85th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
84th

Ducks — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 5,439 kg against 3,885 kg in Rwanda, a difference of 1,554 kg.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Rwanda ranks 85th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 84th of 94 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kg 1,830 kg 1,830 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0 kg 2,564 kg 2,564 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 1,492 kg 3,093 kg 1,601 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 2,720 kg 3,823 kg 1,103 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 3,481 kg 5,082 kg 1,601 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 3,730 kg 5,284 kg 1,554 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 3,769 kg 5,401 kg 1,632 kg Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure applied to soils, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 5,439 kg against 3,885 kg in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure applied to soils between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
1,554 kg, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ducks — manure applied to soils?
Rwanda ranks 85th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 84th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/">Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).