Central African Republic vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Central African Republic
606.11 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
1,632 kg
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
86th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
84th

Ducks — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1,632 kg against 606.11 kg in Central African Republic, a difference of 1,026 kg.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.7 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 86th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 84th of 94 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 352.27 kg 549.13 kg 196.86 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 251.77 kg 769.3 kg 517.53 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 326.37 kg 927.82 kg 601.45 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 391.64 kg 1,147 kg 755.31 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 466.24 kg 1,525 kg 1,058 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 559.49 kg 1,585 kg 1,026 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 606.11 kg 1,620 kg 1,014 kg Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure applied to soils that leaches, Central African Republic or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1,632 kg against 606.11 kg in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure applied to soils that leaches between Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe?
1,026 kg, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ducks — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Central African Republic ranks 86th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 84th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/central-african-republic/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/central-african-republic/sao-tome-and-principe/">Central African Republic vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).