Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Belarus
302,212 kg
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
352,384 kg
in 2023
Belarus rank
22nd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
20th

Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Belarus
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 352,384 kg against 302,212 kg in Belarus, a difference of 50,172 kg.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 22nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 20th of 94 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 161,957 kg 260,276 kg 98,319 kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 259,423 kg 307,234 kg 47,811 kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 304,196 kg 354,622 kg 50,426 kg Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Belarus or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 352,384 kg against 302,212 kg in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
50,172 kg, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Belarus ranks 22nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 20th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/belarus/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/belarus/sub-saharan-africa/">Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).