French Guiana vs Zimbabwe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

French Guiana
2,847 kg
in 2006
Zimbabwe
2,735 kg
in 2023
French Guiana rank
71st
Zimbabwe rank
72nd

Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • French Guiana
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

French Guiana currently reports 2,847 kg against 2,735 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 112 kg.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Guiana ahead.

French Guiana ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 94 countries.

French Guiana has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Guiana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 189.77 kg 155.41 kg 34.35 kg French Guiana
1970s 389.02 kg 205.15 kg 183.88 kg French Guiana
1980s 1,423 kg 668.28 kg 754.98 kg French Guiana
1990s 2,524 kg 1,501 kg 1,023 kg French Guiana
2000s 2,494 kg 2,198 kg 296.11 kg French Guiana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises, French Guiana or Zimbabwe?
French Guiana, at 2,847 kg against 2,735 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2006.
What is the difference in ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises between French Guiana and Zimbabwe?
112 kg, with French Guiana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Guiana and Zimbabwe?
46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
How do French Guiana and Zimbabwe rank globally for ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
French Guiana ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Guiana vs Zimbabwe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/french-guiana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/french-guiana/zimbabwe/">French Guiana vs Zimbabwe: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).