Jordan vs Rwanda: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Jordan
332.09 kg
in 2023
Rwanda
777.07 kg
in 2023
Jordan rank
95th
Rwanda rank
94th

Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Jordan
  • Rwanda
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 777.07 kg against 332.09 kg in Jordan, a difference of 444.98 kg.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 2.3 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Jordan ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 94th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 52.71 kg 0 kg 52.71 kg Jordan
1970s 227.72 kg 0 kg 227.72 kg Jordan
1980s 128.09 kg 298.39 kg 170.3 kg Rwanda
1990s 80.65 kg 543.95 kg 463.3 kg Rwanda
2000s 256.19 kg 696.25 kg 440.06 kg Rwanda
2010s 289.4 kg 745.98 kg 456.59 kg Rwanda
2020s 320.23 kg 753.75 kg 433.52 kg Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Jordan or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 777.07 kg against 332.09 kg in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Jordan and Rwanda?
444.98 kg, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Rwanda rank globally for ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Jordan ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 94th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Rwanda: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/jordan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/jordan/rwanda/">Jordan vs Rwanda: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).