Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Melanesia
20,946 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
42,335 kg
in 2023
Melanesia rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 42,335 kg against 20,946 kg in Melanesia, a difference of 21,389 kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 2.0 times Melanesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Melanesia ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 14 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 4,390 kg 50,751 kg 46,361 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 7,109 kg 51,053 kg 43,944 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 9,331 kg 28,783 kg 19,452 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 12,044 kg 37,299 kg 25,255 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 14,774 kg 40,749 kg 25,976 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 18,725 kg 41,884 kg 23,159 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 20,470 kg 42,304 kg 21,833 kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 42,335 kg against 20,946 kg in Melanesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
21,389 kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Melanesia ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 14 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).