Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Philippines
1.20 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
42,335 kg
in 2023
Philippines rank
11th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Philippines
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 1.20 million kg against 42,335 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.16 million kg.

That makes Philippines's figure about 28.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 94 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 171,864 kg 50,751 kg 121,112 kg Philippines
1970s 321,376 kg 51,053 kg 270,322 kg Philippines
1980s 474,474 kg 28,783 kg 445,691 kg Philippines
1990s 816,147 kg 37,299 kg 778,848 kg Philippines
2000s 911,668 kg 40,749 kg 870,919 kg Philippines
2010s 928,427 kg 41,884 kg 886,543 kg Philippines
2020s 1.11 million kg 42,304 kg 1.06 million kg Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Philippines or United Republic of Tanzania?
Philippines, at 1.20 million kg against 42,335 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.16 million kg, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ducks — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Philippines ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/philippines/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/philippines/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).