China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Ducks — Manure left on pasture

China, Hong Kong SAR
84,447 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
58,304 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
39th

Ducks — Manure left on pasture over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 84,447 kg against 58,304 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 26,143 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 94 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 90,109 kg 3,313 kg 86,796 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 162,160 kg 4,373 kg 157,787 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 282,168 kg 14,245 kg 267,924 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 132,894 kg 32,001 kg 100,893 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 89,907 kg 48,300 kg 41,607 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 88,414 kg 55,191 kg 33,224 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 84,538 kg 57,973 kg 26,564 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure left on pasture, China, Hong Kong SAR or Zimbabwe?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 84,447 kg against 58,304 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure left on pasture between China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
26,143 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe rank globally for ducks — manure left on pasture?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Ducks — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/zimbabwe/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Ducks — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).