Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure left on pasture

Philippines
4.92 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
902,395 kg
in 2023
Philippines rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Ducks — Manure left on pasture over time

  • Philippines
  • United Republic of Tanzania
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 4.92 million kg against 902,395 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 4.02 million kg.

That makes Philippines's figure about 5.5 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Philippines ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 94 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 6 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 705,138 kg 1.08 million kg 376,660 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 1.32 million kg 1.09 million kg 230,329 kg Philippines
1980s 1.95 million kg 613,523 kg 1.33 million kg Philippines
1990s 3.35 million kg 795,062 kg 2.55 million kg Philippines
2000s 3.74 million kg 868,605 kg 2.87 million kg Philippines
2010s 3.81 million kg 892,788 kg 2.92 million kg Philippines
2020s 4.53 million kg 901,733 kg 3.63 million kg Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure left on pasture, Philippines or United Republic of Tanzania?
Philippines, at 4.92 million kg against 902,395 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure left on pasture between Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania?
4.02 million kg, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Philippines and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ducks — manure left on pasture?
Philippines ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/philippines/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/philippines/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Philippines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).