Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Equatorial Guinea
5,035 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
4,638 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
49th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
52nd

Ducks — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 5,035 kg against 4,638 kg in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 397 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 52nd of 94 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 3,416 kg 1,561 kg 1,855 kg Equatorial Guinea
1970s 3,498 kg 2,186 kg 1,312 kg Equatorial Guinea
1980s 3,869 kg 2,637 kg 1,232 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 3,975 kg 3,260 kg 715.55 kg Equatorial Guinea
2000s 3,975 kg 4,333 kg 357.78 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 4,691 kg 4,505 kg 185.51 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 5,035 kg 4,605 kg 430.66 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Equatorial Guinea, at 5,035 kg against 4,638 kg in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
397 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ducks — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 52nd of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Ducks — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).