Czechia vs Serbia and Montenegro: Ducks — Manure management
Ducks — Manure management over time
- Czechia
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 514,214 kg against 480,963 kg in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 33,251 kg.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia and Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 37th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 38th of 94 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 327,732 kg | 409,964 kg | 82,232 kg | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 322,025 kg | 440,883 kg | 118,858 kg | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ducks — manure management, Czechia or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Czechia, at 514,214 kg against 480,963 kg in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2020.
- What is the difference in ducks — manure management between Czechia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 33,251 kg, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Czechia and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for ducks — manure management?
- Czechia ranks 37th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 38th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).