Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Stocks

Middle Africa
86,000 An
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
1.36 million An
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Ducks — Stocks over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 1.36 million An against 86,000 An in Middle Africa, a difference of 1.28 million An.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 15.8 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 14 groups.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 45,111 An 1.63 million An 1.59 million An United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 48,300 An 1.64 million An 1.59 million An United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 56,100 An 926,000 An 869,900 An United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 63,000 An 1.20 million An 1.14 million An United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 72,700 An 1.31 million An 1.24 million An United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 81,400 An 1.35 million An 1.27 million An United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 85,750 An 1.36 million An 1.28 million An United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ducks — stocks, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 1.36 million An against 86,000 An in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in ducks — stocks between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.28 million An, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ducks — stocks?
Middle Africa ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ducks — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-stocks/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ducks-stocks/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Ducks — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Ducks — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
139 places, 7,603 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).