What is the difference in economically active population in agriculture, female between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?

56,000 FAO, number, with Eswatini ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?

33 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2012.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Economically active population in agriculture, female (FAO, number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Economically active population in agriculture, female

Eswatini

73,000 FAO, number

in 2012

Sao Tome and Principe

17,000 FAO, number

in 2012

Eswatini rank

48th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

50th

Economically active population in agriculture, female over time

Eswatini
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 73,000 FAO, number against 17,000 FAO, number in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 56,000 FAO, number.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 4.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 48th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 50th of 53 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
1980s	76,100 FAO, number	8,800 FAO, number	67,300 FAO, number	Eswatini
1990s	88,100 FAO, number	10,600 FAO, number	77,500 FAO, number	Eswatini
2000s	81,300 FAO, number	13,700 FAO, number	67,600 FAO, number	Eswatini
2010s	74,000 FAO, number	16,333 FAO, number	57,667 FAO, number	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher economically active population in agriculture, female, Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?: Eswatini, at 73,000 FAO, number against 17,000 FAO, number in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2012.
What is the difference in economically active population in agriculture, female between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?: 56,000 FAO, number, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2012.
How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for economically active population in agriculture, female?: Eswatini ranks 48th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 50th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Economically active population in agriculture, female (FAO, number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Economically active population in agriculture, female. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/economically-active-population-in-agriculture-female-fao-number/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/economically-active-population-in-agriculture-female-fao-number/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/">Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Economically active population in agriculture, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Economically active population in agriculture, female (FAO, number)
Unit: FAO, number
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 59 places, 1,934 data points, 1980–2012
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Economically active female population in agriculture is that part of the economically active female population engaged in or seeking work in agriculture, hunting, fishing or forestry.