Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Electronic waste collected, per capita

Australia and New Zealand
9.32
in 2022
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
0.0379
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
23rd
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd

Electronic waste collected, per capita over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
0246810201220172022

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 9.32 against 0.0379 in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 9.28.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 246.1 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 23rd and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 51 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 3.04 0.016 3.03 Australia and New Zealand
2020s 9.27 0.0375 9.23 Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electronic waste collected, per capita, Australia and New Zealand or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 9.32 against 0.0379 in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2022.
What is the difference in electronic waste collected, per capita between Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
9.28, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for electronic waste collected, per capita?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 23rd and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Electronic waste collected, per capita (KG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Electronic waste collected, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/electronic-waste-collected-per-capita-kg/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/electronic-waste-collected-per-capita-kg/australia-and-new-zealand/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Electronic waste collected, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electronic waste collected, per capita (KG)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
84 places, 1,093 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed