Finland vs Romania: Environmental protection expenditure by size class (NACE Rev. 2, B-E)
Finland
66.8
in 2017
Romania
158.2
in 2018
Finland rank
2nd
Romania rank
1st
Environmental protection expenditure by size class (NACE Rev. 2, B-E) over time
- Finland
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 158.2 against 66.8 in Finland, a difference of 91.4.
That makes Romania's figure about 2.4 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Romania ahead.
Finland ranks 2nd and Romania ranks 1st of 22 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.5 | 28.55 | 10.95 | Finland |
| 2010s | 40.92 | 52.7 | 11.78 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection expenditure by size class (nace rev. 2, b-e), Finland or Romania?
- Romania, at 158.2 against 66.8 in Finland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmental protection expenditure by size class (nace rev. 2, b-e) between Finland and Romania?
- 91.4, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Romania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Finland and Romania rank globally for environmental protection expenditure by size class (nace rev. 2, b-e)?
- Finland ranks 2nd and Romania ranks 1st of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Environmental protection expenditure by size class (NACE Rev. 2, B-E) (2008-2018). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.