Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Equidae — Stocks

Melanesia
40,346 LSU
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
57,608 LSU
in 2023
Melanesia rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Equidae — Stocks over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 57,608 LSU against 40,346 LSU in Melanesia, a difference of 17,262 LSU.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Melanesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Melanesia ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 20,331 LSU 46,200 LSU 25,869 LSU United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 28,080 LSU 48,060 LSU 19,980 LSU United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 34,663 LSU 50,520 LSU 15,857 LSU United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 38,810 LSU 53,040 LSU 14,230 LSU United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 40,167 LSU 54,540 LSU 14,373 LSU United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 42,819 LSU 56,023 LSU 13,204 LSU United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 41,086 LSU 57,366 LSU 16,279 LSU United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher equidae — stocks, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 57,608 LSU against 40,346 LSU in Melanesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in equidae — stocks between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
17,262 LSU, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for equidae — stocks?
Melanesia ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Equidae — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Equidae — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/equidae-stocks/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/equidae-stocks/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Equidae — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Equidae — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 12,474 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.