Botswana vs Latvia: F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes
F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- Botswana
- Latvia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.4395 Mt CO2e against 0.4369 Mt CO2e in Latvia, a difference of 0.0026 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Latvia ahead.
Botswana ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 113th of 154 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.007 Mt CO2e | 0.0765 Mt CO2e | 0.0696 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.105 Mt CO2e | 0.2867 Mt CO2e | 0.1817 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.1962 Mt CO2e | 0.4031 Mt CO2e | 0.207 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.3823 Mt CO2e | 0.4293 Mt CO2e | 0.047 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher f-gases emissions from industrial processes, Botswana or Latvia?
- Botswana, at 0.4395 Mt CO2e against 0.4369 Mt CO2e in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in f-gases emissions from industrial processes between Botswana and Latvia?
- 0.0026 Mt CO2e, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Latvia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Latvia rank globally for f-gases emissions from industrial processes?
- Botswana ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 113th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of fluorinated gases (hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).