Cuba vs Finland: F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes
F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- Cuba
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.6944 Mt CO2e against 0.6889 Mt CO2e in Cuba, a difference of 0.0055 Mt CO2e.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 96th and Finland ranks 95th of 154 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0214 Mt CO2e | 0.2773 Mt CO2e | 0.2559 Mt CO2e | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.1839 Mt CO2e | 1.15 Mt CO2e | 0.9635 Mt CO2e | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.3151 Mt CO2e | 1.21 Mt CO2e | 0.8948 Mt CO2e | Finland |
| 2020s | 0.6009 Mt CO2e | 0.8155 Mt CO2e | 0.2146 Mt CO2e | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher f-gases emissions from industrial processes, Cuba or Finland?
- Finland, at 0.6944 Mt CO2e against 0.6889 Mt CO2e in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in f-gases emissions from industrial processes between Cuba and Finland?
- 0.0055 Mt CO2e, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for f-gases emissions from industrial processes?
- Cuba ranks 96th and Finland ranks 95th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of fluorinated gases (hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).