Cuba vs Zimbabwe: F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes
F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.7112 Mt CO2e against 0.6889 Mt CO2e in Cuba, a difference of 0.0223 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 154 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0214 Mt CO2e | 0.0113 Mt CO2e | 0.0101 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.1839 Mt CO2e | 0.1699 Mt CO2e | 0.014 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.3151 Mt CO2e | 0.3175 Mt CO2e | 0.0024 Mt CO2e | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.6009 Mt CO2e | 0.6185 Mt CO2e | 0.0176 Mt CO2e | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher f-gases emissions from industrial processes, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.7112 Mt CO2e against 0.6889 Mt CO2e in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in f-gases emissions from industrial processes between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0223 Mt CO2e, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for f-gases emissions from industrial processes?
- Cuba ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of fluorinated gases (hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).