Dominican Republic vs Sudan: F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes
F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- Dominican Republic
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2.1 Mt CO2e against 2.05 Mt CO2e in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.05 Mt CO2e.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 61st and Sudan ranks 59th of 154 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0325 Mt CO2e | 0.0334 Mt CO2e | 0.0009 Mt CO2e | Sudan |
| 2000s | 0.4888 Mt CO2e | 0.5026 Mt CO2e | 0.0138 Mt CO2e | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.9131 Mt CO2e | 0.939 Mt CO2e | 0.0259 Mt CO2e | Sudan |
| 2020s | 1.78 Mt CO2e | 1.83 Mt CO2e | 0.0504 Mt CO2e | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher f-gases emissions from industrial processes, Dominican Republic or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 2.1 Mt CO2e against 2.05 Mt CO2e in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in f-gases emissions from industrial processes between Dominican Republic and Sudan?
- 0.05 Mt CO2e, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Sudan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Dominican Republic and Sudan rank globally for f-gases emissions from industrial processes?
- Dominican Republic ranks 61st and Sudan ranks 59th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of fluorinated gases (hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).