IDA blend vs Libya: F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes
F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- IDA blend
- Libya
How they compare
IDA blend currently reports 34.24 Mt CO2e against 5.33 Mt CO2e in Libya, a difference of 28.91 Mt CO2e.
That makes IDA blend's figure about 6.4 times Libya's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, IDA blend has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 36th and Libya ranks 36th of 47 groups.
IDA blend has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.21 Mt CO2e | 0.2536 Mt CO2e | 1.96 Mt CO2e | IDA blend |
| 2000s | 9.21 Mt CO2e | 1.39 Mt CO2e | 7.81 Mt CO2e | IDA blend |
| 2010s | 16.17 Mt CO2e | 2.55 Mt CO2e | 13.63 Mt CO2e | IDA blend |
| 2020s | 30.01 Mt CO2e | 4.67 Mt CO2e | 25.33 Mt CO2e | IDA blend |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher f-gases emissions from industrial processes, IDA blend or Libya?
- IDA blend, at 34.24 Mt CO2e against 5.33 Mt CO2e in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in f-gases emissions from industrial processes between IDA blend and Libya?
- 28.91 Mt CO2e, with IDA blend ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do IDA blend and Libya rank globally for f-gases emissions from industrial processes?
- IDA blend ranks 36th and Libya ranks 36th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of fluorinated gases (hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).