Latvia vs Malawi: F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes
F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- Latvia
- Malawi
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.4369 Mt CO2e against 0.4315 Mt CO2e in Malawi, a difference of 0.0054 Mt CO2e.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 113th and Malawi ranks 114th of 154 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0765 Mt CO2e | 0.0069 Mt CO2e | 0.0697 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.2867 Mt CO2e | 0.1031 Mt CO2e | 0.1836 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.4031 Mt CO2e | 0.1926 Mt CO2e | 0.2105 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.4293 Mt CO2e | 0.3753 Mt CO2e | 0.054 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher f-gases emissions from industrial processes, Latvia or Malawi?
- Latvia, at 0.4369 Mt CO2e against 0.4315 Mt CO2e in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in f-gases emissions from industrial processes between Latvia and Malawi?
- 0.0054 Mt CO2e, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Malawi rank globally for f-gases emissions from industrial processes?
- Latvia ranks 113th and Malawi ranks 114th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of fluorinated gases (hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).