Lithuania vs Mali: F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes
F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- Lithuania
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0.5973 Mt CO2e against 0.5932 Mt CO2e in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0041 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 103rd and Mali ranks 101st of 154 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0633 Mt CO2e | 0.0095 Mt CO2e | 0.0538 Mt CO2e | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.2181 Mt CO2e | 0.1427 Mt CO2e | 0.0754 Mt CO2e | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.5599 Mt CO2e | 0.2666 Mt CO2e | 0.2933 Mt CO2e | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.5992 Mt CO2e | 0.5195 Mt CO2e | 0.0797 Mt CO2e | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher f-gases emissions from industrial processes, Lithuania or Mali?
- Mali, at 0.5973 Mt CO2e against 0.5932 Mt CO2e in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in f-gases emissions from industrial processes between Lithuania and Mali?
- 0.0041 Mt CO2e, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mali?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Mali rank globally for f-gases emissions from industrial processes?
- Lithuania ranks 103rd and Mali ranks 101st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of fluorinated gases (hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).