Nicaragua vs Uzbekistan: F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes
F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- Nicaragua
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.2697 Mt CO2e against 0.2606 Mt CO2e in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.0091 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 124th and Uzbekistan ranks 125th of 154 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0043 Mt CO2e | 0.0531 Mt CO2e | 0.0488 Mt CO2e | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.0644 Mt CO2e | 0.1049 Mt CO2e | 0.0405 Mt CO2e | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.1204 Mt CO2e | 0.1602 Mt CO2e | 0.0398 Mt CO2e | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.2346 Mt CO2e | 0.2407 Mt CO2e | 0.0061 Mt CO2e | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher f-gases emissions from industrial processes, Nicaragua or Uzbekistan?
- Nicaragua, at 0.2697 Mt CO2e against 0.2606 Mt CO2e in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in f-gases emissions from industrial processes between Nicaragua and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0091 Mt CO2e, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Uzbekistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Nicaragua and Uzbekistan rank globally for f-gases emissions from industrial processes?
- Nicaragua ranks 124th and Uzbekistan ranks 125th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of fluorinated gases (hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).