Iceland vs Rwanda: FDI inflows to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
FDI inflows to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time
- Iceland
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 23.2 million USD against 21.32 million USD in Iceland, a difference of 1.88 million USD.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Rwanda ahead.
Iceland ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 35th of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1415 million USD | 2.36 million USD | 2.22 million USD | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 18.17 million USD | 13.15 million USD | 5.02 million USD | Iceland |
| 2020s | 109.93 million USD | 29.92 million USD | 80.01 million USD | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fdi inflows to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Iceland or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 23.2 million USD against 21.32 million USD in Iceland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in fdi inflows to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Iceland and Rwanda?
- 1.88 million USD, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Rwanda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Rwanda rank globally for fdi inflows to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
- Iceland ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 35th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FDI inflows to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.