Iceland vs Poland: FDI outflows to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$
FDI outflows to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$ over time
- Iceland
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports -31.79 million USD against -65.24 million USD in Iceland, a difference of 33.45 million USD.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 39th and Poland ranks 38th of 41 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.15 million USD | -0.6882 million USD | 5.83 million USD | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1.92 million USD | 3.26 million USD | 1.34 million USD | Poland |
| 2020s | -74.7 million USD | -14.13 million USD | 60.56 million USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fdi outflows to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, Iceland or Poland?
- Poland, at -31.79 million USD against -65.24 million USD in Iceland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fdi outflows to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$ between Iceland and Poland?
- 33.45 million USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Poland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Poland rank globally for fdi outflows to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$?
- Iceland ranks 39th and Poland ranks 38th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FDI outflows to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.