Armenia vs Dominican Republic: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Armenia
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 140 t against 96 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 44 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.5 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Armenia ranks 19th and Dominican Republic ranks 20th of 29 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,952 t | 4,032 t | 1,080 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 14,754 t | 107 t | 14,648 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use, Armenia or Dominican Republic?
- Armenia, at 140 t against 96 t in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use between Armenia and Dominican Republic?
- 44 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Dominican Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Dominican Republic rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Armenia ranks 19th and Dominican Republic ranks 20th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf