Bermuda vs Pakistan: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use

Bermuda
32 t
in 2021
Pakistan
0 t
in 2023
Bermuda rank
22nd
Pakistan rank
23rd

Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time

  • Bermuda
  • Pakistan
020406080201220172023

How they compare

Bermuda currently reports 32 t against 0 t in Pakistan, a difference of 32 t.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Bermuda has been ahead every year.

Bermuda ranks 22nd and Pakistan ranks 23rd of 29 countries.

Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Pakistan Difference Ahead
2010s 50.83 t 0 t 50.83 t Bermuda
2020s 39 t 0 t 39 t Bermuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use, Bermuda or Pakistan?
Bermuda, at 32 t against 0 t in Pakistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use between Bermuda and Pakistan?
32 t, with Bermuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Pakistan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
How do Bermuda and Pakistan rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use?
Bermuda ranks 22nd and Pakistan ranks 23rd of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
29 places, 265 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf