Ecuador vs El Salvador: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 332,130 t against 143,699 t in El Salvador, a difference of 188,431 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 2.3 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was El Salvador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 2nd and El Salvador ranks 5th of 29 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25,529 t | 138,202 t | 112,673 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 324,620 t | 43,604 t | 281,017 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use, Ecuador or El Salvador?
- Ecuador, at 332,130 t against 143,699 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use between Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 188,431 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 2nd and El Salvador ranks 5th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf