Ecuador vs Republic of Moldova: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 332,130 t against 29,405 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 302,725 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 11.3 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Ecuador ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23,435 t | 20,459 t | 2,976 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 306,816 t | 28,247 t | 278,570 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use, Ecuador or Republic of Moldova?
- Ecuador, at 332,130 t against 29,405 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use between Ecuador and Republic of Moldova?
- 302,725 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Republic of Moldova?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and Republic of Moldova rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf