El Salvador vs Slovak Republic: Fertilizers n.e.c. β Agricultural Use
Fertilizers n.e.c. β Agricultural Use over time
- El Salvador
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 143,699 t against 45,891 t in Slovak Republic, a difference of 97,808 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 3.1 times Slovak Republic's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 5th and Slovak Republic ranks 6th of 27 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 143,204 t | 22,061 t | 121,143 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 63,623 t | 45,687 t | 17,935 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. β agricultural use, El Salvador or Slovak Republic?
- El Salvador, at 143,699 t against 45,891 t in Slovak Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. β agricultural use between El Salvador and Slovak Republic?
- 97,808 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Slovak Republic?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Slovak Republic rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. β agricultural use?
- El Salvador ranks 5th and Slovak Republic ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf