Ghana vs Switzerland: Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use

Ghana
0 t
in 2022
Switzerland
0 t
in 2020
Ghana rank
23rd
Switzerland rank
23rd

Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time

  • Ghana
  • Switzerland
010.0k20.0k30.0k201220172022

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Switzerland, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 23rd and Switzerland ranks 23rd of 29 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Switzerland Difference Ahead
2010s 7,759 t 2,227 t 5,533 t Ghana
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use, Ghana or Switzerland?
Ghana, at 0 t against 0 t in Switzerland as of 2022.
What is the difference in fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use between Ghana and Switzerland?
0 t, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Switzerland?
6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
How do Ghana and Switzerland rank globally for fertilizers n.e.c. — agricultural use?
Ghana ranks 23rd and Switzerland ranks 23rd of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Fertilizers n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
29 places, 265 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf